Vito Acconci recounts the evolution of public space as the conception of time has changed throughout our societal world. Public spaces have not only been restricted by policies and laws, but it has also expanded with the introduction of virtual space.
Within paragraph "9" Vito discusses the notion of two types of places: historical and virtual. He begins by explaining the evolution of the historical place. Clusters of individuals must move indoors to keep intact. These indoor settings can be commonly seen as bars, cafes, etc. People come to these places either for a service or to be part of a group. In many cases, on may come with the excuse of receiving a service, but the cluster is essentially brought together by the common service. What gives this place a sense of "place" is that it becomes distinguished from the surrounding places.
Historical places are preservation or recreations of the place it was previously. These places have time, time that is ultimate. In further distinction, Vito claims the historical place as equivalent to going home. In opposition, virtual spaces is equivalent to going on vacation. These places have no time. Yet, what is a place without time? In both cases, the place is linked with memory or imagination. The ultimate drive: companionship.
No comments:
Post a Comment